TSTP Solution File: SET173^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SET173^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 09:04:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.08s 0.29s
% Output : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 14 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 99 ( 29 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 113 ( 14 ~; 25 |; 13 &; 59 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 14 ( 14 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 10 ^ 8 !; 4 ?; 23 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_8,type,
sK0: a > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
sK1: a > $o ).
thf(func_def_11,type,
ph3:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_12,type,
sK4: a ).
thf(f43,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f33,f42]) ).
thf(f42,plain,
~ spl2_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f41]) ).
thf(f41,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f37]) ).
thf(f37,plain,
( ( $true = $false )
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f31,f18]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $false ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f17]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $false )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $false ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $false )
| ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
| ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
= $false ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $false )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $false )
| ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
| ( sK1 @ sK4 ) )
= $false ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $false )
| ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
& ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
| ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) )
= $false ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
& ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
| ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) )
!= ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f10]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ sK4 ) ),
inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
( sK0
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
( sK0
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( X0 @ Y0 )
& ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
| ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
!= X0 )
=> ( sK0
!= ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
& ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( X0 @ Y0 )
& ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
| ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
!= X0 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( X0 @ Y0 )
& ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
| ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
= X0 ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
| ( X0 @ X2 ) )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
= X0 ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
| ( X0 @ X2 ) )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
= X0 ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,conjecture,
! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [X2: a] :
( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
| ( X0 @ X2 ) )
& ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
= X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.j1PBVpeDTk/Vampire---4.8_20871',cBOOL_PROP_68_pme) ).
thf(f31,plain,
( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $true )
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).
thf(f29,plain,
( spl2_2
<=> ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $true ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).
thf(f33,plain,
spl2_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f29]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $true ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $true )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $true ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
& ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
| ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) )
= $true )
| ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
= $true ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SET173^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Fri May 3 16:55:07 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.28 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.08/0.28 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.j1PBVpeDTk/Vampire---4.8_20871
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.08/0.29 % (21060)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)First to succeed.
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.08/0.29 % (21062)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.08/0.29 % (21060)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.08/0.29
% 0.08/0.29
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.29 % (21068)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.29 % (21062)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.29 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.08/0.29 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.29
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.29 % (21061)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.29 % (21059)Success in time 0.01 s
% 0.08/0.29 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------